Unfriend Me

by Daedalus Howell on August 30, 2010

How to be a Social Medea and give “friends” the axe

Credit must go to Facebook for turning “friend” into a verb, as in “Friend me on Facebook,” or perhaps “Go friend yourself,” should one choose to decline the invitation. When it became appended with the antonymic prefix “un-,” the new verb took its place in the New Oxford American Dictionary last November as the lexicographer’s choice of “word of the year.”

“It has both currency and potential longevity,” senior lexicographer Christine Lindberg of Oxford’s U.S. dictionary program told CNN at the time. “In the online social networking context, its meaning is understood, so its adoption as a modern verb form makes this an interesting choice for word of the year.”

Of course, new entries into the lexicon can’t be truly integrated into the language until some daft, first-year journalism student attempts to use it in a dreaded “dictionary lead” á la “The New Oxford American Dictionary defines ‘unfriend’ as ‘To remove someone as a friend on a social networking site.’” Likewise, “retweet” is also a pitch-perfect neologism: if to “tweet” is to post something on Twitter, then to retweet, one can easily intuit, is to repost (not to be confused with “riposte,” a fencing term used to describe an arch reply dipped in wit—which often accompany retweets) that tweet. Of course, “retweet” sounds like what Elmer Fudd would say at Waterloo, but in cyberspace no one can hear you scream, so what does it matter?

Long a verb in its own right, Google is said to be cooking up its own Facebook-killer, “Google Me,” which apparently makes one’s self-absorption sharable online with the masses you might eventually unfriend. To “Ungoogle Me” would likely be the result of an online restraining order. The fine folks at the Oxford American Dictionary will likely leave that one, well, undefined.

From the get-go, public relations professionals have hitched their wagons to Facebook lest they be made irrelevant by the bumper crop of social-media marketing professionals (and otherwise) once everyone realized the platform combined the worst aspects of open-mic night and a social disease. Everyone has a shot at infecting their friends with the message; now advertisers, corporate and individual brands and causes are considered so-last-century if they’re not represented on what was quaintly called “the” Facebook until its fateful name change in 2005.

Among those trying to refract a little of the site’s limelight is Know Me Social Media Marketing, which is simultaneously based in San Diego, Calif., and Nashville, Tenn. The company, whose “head geek” Don Lowe could pass as a stand-in for Dan Aykroyd circa My Stepmother Is an Alien, is promoting its Facebook-inspired-brainchild “Worldwide 1st Annual Delete a Friend Week on Facebook.” Represented by a fan page on the site entitled “Delete a Friend Week,” the campaign, as of this writing, boasts 2,266 fans.

“This fall, fall out of touch with seven of your most annoying friends. Starting Sept. 1st, join us in deleting seven Facebook friends who drive you nuts,” reads the fan page. “Maybe it’s that they never comment or maybe it’s because they write posts that are 19 paragraphs. Let us know what made you decide to delete them as well.”

The fact that joining a Facebook page while unfriending friends is akin to taking seven steps forward and one step back in terms of managing one’s online relationships hasn’t seemed to bother the “movement’s” adherents. The call to post one’s reasons for dropping people is the campaign’s secret weapon: it provides a forum to justify what others might construe as an antisocial act. One can cut a cretin with a clear conscious by posting that one has tired of “those people who post about their ‘awesome’ mac & cheese” as one woman wrote. Participants aren’t so much cutting friends, however, as redirecting their energies to another corner of Facebook’s walled garden while bolstering a marketing company’s portfolio.

That the gauge of Know Me Social Media Marketing’s success lies within a body count of ended online relationships is not as peculiar as the fact that it has been so embraced prior to its official launch next week. It’s a queasy catharsis, for sure, but “digital dharma” has yet to enter the dictionary.

Alas, “frenemy” already has.

Unfriend me here.

{ 0 comments }

The Wheel of 4Chan

by Daedalus Howell on August 14, 2010

Online community gets spin from Fox to Anonymous

For some, like Fox News, the online community known as “4chan” is a terrorist training camp. For others, including a growing cadre of Sonoma County teens—particularly those who are male, live with their parents and are practiced in navigating the backwaters of the web—4chan is a graffiti-tagged playground where the proverbial soapboxes of free speech are stacked like an endless game of Jenga.

“It depends on where you go,” said an 18-year-old Sonoma man, who, like the de facto identity setting when one logs on to 4chan.org, prefers to remain anonymous. “Some places are the armpit of the internet; other places are a great place to share information, photos and generally waste time.”

In its current iteration, the board offers little more in the way of user interface than the assiduously utilitarian Craigslist. Though 4chan may look like a reliquary for ancient HTML code, it functions as the primordial soup from which many of the internet’s memes erupt virally into public consciousness, from Rick-rolling (punking people with cloaked links to a certain Rick Astley video) to “LOL cats,” photos of kitties captioned with poor grammar (and later the cornerstone of a media empire launched Ben Huh, who was featured here in May).

Like much of the internet’s quirkier mutations, 4chan was birthed in the bedroom of a 15-year-old high school student. It’s putative father, the now 22-year-old Christopher Poole, who uses the online handle “moot,” sought to create an American version of the popular Japanese board, Futaba Channel, which itself was an offshoot of 2channel, another Japanese site thought to be the largest online forum in the world. 4chan offers a bevy of forum topics, from Japanese culture and creative pursuits (origami, art criticism, fashion) to weapons and the paranormal and, predictably, most shades of pornography, animated and otherwise.

As with any community, 4chan has its own culture and protocols with different permutations for each topic forum. It even has an orientation procedure of a sort. According to the Sonoma teen, most people begin their 4chan odyssey in a forum simply called “/B/.”

“If you’re in /B/, you’re probably an immature asshole. Most people who start out in /B/ are about between the ages of 11 and 18, like my age, and it can go higher and lower, but it doesn’t really matter,” the teen explained. “It’s just the way it works—it’s like your growing-up period. It’s that stage of puberty.”

It follows then that one’s online pubescence comes besotted with juvenile humor, especially as regards the use of one’s identity.

“If you put a name in the name field, you’re called ‘name fag,’ which most users don’t mind. They’re usually not douche bags or people who are likely to get flamed,” explained the Sonoman, who made ample apologies for the board’s use of hate language. First timers are advised to “lurk,” online parlance for lingering in a forum and absorbing its ethos before eventually daring to post something. The blowback for not respecting the culture of a board can result in an online tongue-lashing or worse.

Some 4chan participants, under the loose moniker “Anonymous” (what else?), have allegedly organized campaigns of harassment against organizations and individuals that have raised its ire. Last month, the group virtually shut Gawker.com down, swamping the massive aggregate’s servers. Last spring, Brian Mettenbrink of Nebraska was sentenced to a year in federal prison and ordered to pay $20,000 in restitution to the Church of Scientology after being convicted of participating in such cyber-attacks. Other allegations have been lobbed at the group, which isn’t so much an organized body as a highly motivated evolutionary offshoot of crowd-sourcing.

Perhaps someday their collective energies will further coalesce and spring new variations on activism, protest or even candidacy. Until then, as the Sonoman explained, “We’re basically the quintessential geek culture, you know.”

But it’s the geeks who shall inherit the earth.

{ 0 comments }

Wolfram Alpha vs. Google vs. Your Brain (on drugs)

August 1, 2010

Last month, the big brains of the “computational knowledge” world gathered in central London to explore how “advances in computational technology are unlocking knowledge assets and shaping the future.” The event, dryly named the London Computational Knowledge Summit, was underwritten by Wolfram Alpha, which bills itself as a “computational knowledge engine,” a tagline so catchy, [...]

Read the full article →

SEO as a Networking Tool

July 26, 2010

In no way do I purport to understand the alchemy of search engine optimization – that arcane conflux of meta tags, algorithmic jockeying and ritual sacrifice to Google that produces page rankings and spankings in equal measure. Well, who knows if it’s equal – that sort of proprietary information lives in some server barn in Mountain [...]

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Read the full article →